Protection gaps
Missing ESD protection on exposed inputs, no reverse polarity protection on a reversible connector, no current limit on a port that will eventually see a short.
An independent review of your schematic and PCB layout by an electronics engineer with 20+ years of experience. Find the problems while they still cost hours, not a board respin.
The engineer who designed the board knows it best, and that is exactly the problem. After weeks on a design, blind spots accumulate. An independent reviewer reads the same schematic with fresh assumptions and routinely catches what the original team stopped seeing: a missing protection device, a derating margin too tight for worst case, a return path that crosses a plane split, a thermal pad that will not carry the real current. This is a dedicated PCB design review service: an independent PCB design audit and pre-production check across schematic, layout, and manufacturability before you commit to a fabrication run.
Every board is different, but the same categories of costly mistake keep appearing. These are the ones a review is built to surface.
Missing ESD protection on exposed inputs, no reverse polarity protection on a reversible connector, no current limit on a port that will eventually see a short.
Parts running too close to their voltage, current, or temperature rating at worst case. Capacitors derated wrongly for DC bias. MOSFETs at the edge of their safe operating area.
High-speed signals crossing reference plane splits, grounds joined in the wrong place, decoupling too far from the pin, sensitive analog routed beside switching power.
Placement the assembly house cannot reach, tombstone risk on small passives, solder mask too thin, outline tolerances that fight the chosen fabricator.
Missing test points on power rails, no access to programming pins, no clean way to provoke a fault during production test.
Creepage and clearance short of the target safety standard, pre-compliance EMC risks that fail in the chamber, connectors incompatible with your target certifications.
Every finding documented with location, severity, the reason it matters, and a specific recommendation.
Where a picture makes it clearer, the report includes schematic snippets, layout captures, and diagrams that point to the exact spot.
Findings sorted into critical, important, and suggestion, so you fix what matters first. No unprioritised list to sift through.
Each finding explains what it would cause in production or in the field, and exactly what to do instead.
A live discussion of the report so questions get answered and recommendations can be clarified or scoped down.
I discuss the design with you, learn your specific concerns, and agree the depth of review.
You send schematics, layout, BOM, and any relevant specifications or context.
A systematic examination of every aspect, with each issue logged by location and severity.
Findings compiled with prioritised recommendations and supporting snippets and diagrams.
A walk-through of the findings so you leave with a clear plan of what to change.
An electronics design engineer with 20+ years of professional experience across analog, digital, RF, and power designs, delivered to clients in 15+ countries. Your board is read by someone who has shipped hardware like it, not handed to a checklist.
See the project portfolioSchematic correctness and component selection, PCB layout including routing and grounding, power integrity and decoupling, signal integrity, EMC and EMI risks, thermal behaviour, manufacturability (DFM), testability (DFT), and compliance with the standards your product is targeting. Findings are written up with severity, location on the design, why each one matters, and a specific recommendation.
Earlier is cheaper. A schematic review before layout catches architectural and component issues when they cost a few hours of rework. A layout review before tape-out catches routing and EMC issues when they cost a board respin. A review of an existing failing prototype is also useful, but the earlier the engagement, the more value the review delivers.
Native Altium, KiCad, and EasyEDA project files are preferred, and reviewing native files is generally cheaper and more accurate because nothing is lost in export. PDF schematics, Gerber output, ODB++, IPC-2581, and BOM CSVs are all accepted. The more the source files include, the deeper the review can go.
A written report with findings ranked by severity (critical, important, suggestion), each with the location, the reason it matters, and a specific recommendation. Snippets and diagrams are included in the report where they make a finding clearer. A walk-through call is included so the design owner can ask questions and clarify the recommendations.
Yes. Design files and the contents of the review remain confidential. NDAs are signed where requested before any files are shared.
A scoped review of a small or medium-complexity board typically completes within 2 to 3 days of receiving the design files, subject to current availability. More complex designs take up to a week. Lead time is confirmed up front in the scope discussion.
Yes. A pre-production check is the core of the service: a full PCB design audit across schematic, layout, power and signal integrity, EMC risk, thermal behaviour, and design for manufacturing, so problems are found on screen rather than on a failed board. KiCad, Altium, and EasyEDA projects are all reviewed.
Send the design and get it back with a prioritised list of what to fix and why. It is a standalone review with no strings attached, so you are never committed to any further work.
Request a Design Review